From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:40:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks In-Reply-To: <1384243549.12583.36.camel@porter.coelho.fi> References: <1382528150.21526.25.camel@porter.coelho.fi> <1383933648-28595-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20131110113716.GN26440@lukather> <20131111194247.GB19212@saruman.home> <1384199456.12583.27.camel@porter.coelho.fi> <20131111205910.GA26440@lukather> <1384243549.12583.36.camel@porter.coelho.fi> Message-ID: <20131113144010.GB3538@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:05:49AM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote: > > What I'm not really convinced about is *how* you carry that metadata > > in the DT, that's all, nothing more. > > Okay, I get you. My point is that being a crystal or not *is* a > characteristic of the clock, so I think it could be part of the flags > that describe it. Yeah, but then, a crystal has a slightly different behaviour and property than a oscillator, therefore the two aren't fully "compatible" with each other. > In any case, it's not really my call. This is about the clock and it's > not even my home turf (wireless). ;) > > Thanks for your comments. And I'm sorry if the tone of my previous > email sounded harsh, it was not supposed to. :) That's fine, don't worry :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: