From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sre@ring0.de (Sebastian Reichel) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:29:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 4/5 v2] input: tc3589x-keypad: support probing from device tree In-Reply-To: <20131113142406.GH21713@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1384265618-10590-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20131112153057.GA9683@earth.universe> <20131112200514.GA15413@earth.universe> <20131112204013.GA17674@earth.universe> <20131113142406.GH21713@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20131113232923.GB13669@earth.universe> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:24:06PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Current suggestions (taken from kernel) are: > > > > * <>,no-autorepeat > > * keypad,autorepeat > > * linux,keypad-no-autorepeat > > * linux,input-no-autorepeat > > * linux,no-autorepeat > > * autorepeat > > > > I do not really care, which one is chosen, except for two things: > > > > * <> seems wrong. This is not vendor specific. > > * I would prefer "input-" over "keypad-", since then the same name > > can be used for single keys, buttons, etc. > > Both of those sound valid to me, but I think it may make sense to keep > the "linux," prefix. As I understand it this is really telling the Linux > input subsystem to react to a device acting in a certain way, rather > than describing or configuring the device in a certain way. That leaves the following two options: * linux,input-no-autorepeat * linux,no-autorepeat Any suggestions for those? -- Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: