From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:40:34 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: mm: Drop the lowmem watermark check from
 virt_addr_valid()
In-Reply-To: <52856B68.4040502@ti.com>
References: <y> <1384457866-16135-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
 <1384457866-16135-4-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
 <20131115002232.GE20516@lvm> <52856B68.4040502@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20131115004034.GG20516@lvm>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:31:36PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 14 November 2013 07:22 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:37:43PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> Slab allocator can allocate memory beyond the lowmem watermark
> >> which can lead to false failure of virt_addr_valid().
> >>
> >> So drop the check. The issue was seen with percpu_alloc()
> >> in KVM code which was allocating memory beyond lowmem watermark.
> >>
> >> Am not completly sure whether this is the right fix and if it could
> >> impact any other user of virt_addr_valid(). Without this fix as
> >> pointed out the KVM init was failing in my testing.
> >>
> >> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> >> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> >> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h |    3 +--
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> >> index 4dd2145..412da47 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> >> @@ -343,8 +343,7 @@ static inline __deprecated void *bus_to_virt(unsigned long x)
> >>  #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET		PHYS_PFN_OFFSET
> >>  
> >>  #define virt_to_page(kaddr)	pfn_to_page(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> >> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr)	((unsigned long)(kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET && (unsigned long)(kaddr) < (unsigned long)high_memory)
> >> -
> >> +#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr)	((unsigned long)(kaddr) >= PAGE_OFFSET)
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >>  #include <asm-generic/memory_model.h>
> >> -- 
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >>
> > 
> > This looks wrong to me.  Check Documentation/arm/memory.txt, this would
> > return true for the VMALLOC region, which would cause virt_to_phys to
> > give you something invalid, which would be bad.
> >
> I also thought it might not be right fix and hence added a disclaimer
> in the commit message ;-)
>  
Yes I know, I'm not holding it against you ;)

Not sure what the nicest fix is though.  I think we can get away with
the single page restriction per call for Hyp mappings for now.  IIRC the
Hyp code is still limited to be within a single page.

Let's see what Marc has to say.

-Christoffer