From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv5] dmaengine: Add support for BCM2835
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:41:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131116114134.GU16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131116112754.GT15393@sirena.org.uk>
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:27:54AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:37:54AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > The reason why I was asking about I'm just wondering what we have to do
> > with existing drivers. Shall we convert them to be initialized as normal
> > platform drivers instead of subsys_initcall?
>
> We should in general be moving in that direction however it does need a
> bit of care to make sure that there aren't any dependencies which do
> things like discard error codes, fail to check errors or treat errors as
> hard failures.
I don't agree: on platforms which have done this, it's very difficult to
tell from reading the kernel message log whether things came up correctly
because there's soo much spew from deferred probing it's virtually
impossible to tell whether component X initialised or whether that error
about resource Y missing was ever resolved.
The only way that can be checked is when things work (or don't) from
userspace.
It's soo bad on some platforms that reading the kernel boot log is a
total waste of time; you don't get any useful information from it.
If we want kernel boot logs to be useful, we really need to shut up *all*
the drivers and subsystems whinging about being deferred probing, and only
have the driver model core reporting this status - maybe only allow
output about why at debug level or similar.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-16 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 16:28 [PATCHv5] dmaengine: Add support for BCM2835 Florian Meier
2013-11-15 17:03 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-15 17:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-15 18:20 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-15 17:43 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2013-11-15 17:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <CAHp75Vf3CJNgSiSjoZ6dYjRRHWN4bTpMxRTLG37+wwtEsQbq4g@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-16 9:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-11-16 11:27 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-16 11:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-11-16 12:22 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131116114134.GU16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).