From: sre@ring0.de (Sebastian Reichel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5 v2] input: tc3589x-keypad: support probing from device tree
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:03:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131117190330.GA21421@earth.universe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131117182845.GB30012@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain>
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > I could find two boards using "gpio-matrix-keypad" in the mainline
> > > > kernel and not a single instance of "linux,no-autorepeat":
> > >
> > > In things connected to GPIO, I don't expect the in-kernel
> > > device trees to be a good way so survey the usage of these
> > > bindings. Anyone doing device trees on any system with a
> > > few GPIOs can be using this.
> > >
> > > But maybe we're lucky and won't break anyone's setup if
> > > we change this?
> >
> > AFAIK Device Tree property names are considered as ABI, so existing
> > property names must not be removed.
> >
> > But I guess we can add the standardized property name in addition
> > to the deprecated one. New drivers can use the standardized property
> > name from the beginning.
> >
> > Thus I guess we should not use the name, which has the most adopters
> > in kernel (or out of kernel). Instead the most fitting name should
> > be used. Current suggestions (taken from kernel) are:
> >
> > * <<vendor>>,no-autorepeat
> > * keypad,autorepeat
> > * linux,keypad-no-autorepeat
> > * linux,input-no-autorepeat
> > * linux,no-autorepeat
> > * autorepeat
> >
> > I do not really care, which one is chosen, except for two things:
> >
> > * <<vendor>> seems wrong. This is not vendor specific.
> > * I would prefer "input-" over "keypad-", since then the same name
> > can be used for single keys, buttons, etc.
>
> Hmm, and it is not Linux-specific, either. So can we stick with simple "autorepeat"?
The advantage of the negated form is, that autorepeat is enabled by
default. So what do you think about
input-no-autorepeat
-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131117/84d641b8/attachment.sig>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-17 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 14:13 [PATCH 4/5 v2] input: tc3589x-keypad: support probing from device tree Linus Walleij
2013-11-12 15:30 ` Sebastian Reichel
2013-11-12 17:06 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-12 20:05 ` Sebastian Reichel
2013-11-12 20:11 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-12 20:40 ` Sebastian Reichel
2013-11-13 14:24 ` Mark Rutland
2013-11-13 23:29 ` Sebastian Reichel
2013-11-14 11:12 ` Mark Rutland
2013-11-17 18:28 ` Pavel Machek
2013-12-02 11:37 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-02 11:54 ` Pavel Machek
2013-12-02 12:08 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-02 13:03 ` Pavel Machek
2013-11-17 18:28 ` Pavel Machek
2013-11-17 19:03 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131117190330.GA21421@earth.universe \
--to=sre@ring0.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).