From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:02:12 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 2/2] kbuild: dtbs_install: new make target In-Reply-To: <20131119142336.GA28859@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <528A65DF.8060000@wwwdotorg.org> <20131118191955.GG10335@titan.lakedaemon.net> <528A6944.3070303@wwwdotorg.org> <20131118192852.GI10335@titan.lakedaemon.net> <528A6CA3.9030904@wwwdotorg.org> <20131118195243.GJ10335@titan.lakedaemon.net> <528A98C8.9040803@wwwdotorg.org> <20131119122801.GL16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20131119142336.GA28859@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20131119150212.GM16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:23:36AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > All I'm suggesting doing is extending the same standard we have for > compatible strings at the node level to the board level. If we don't > change the filename, then we *have* to extend the consistent naming to > the dts files as well. That, in itself, is not a bad thing to do, and totally solves the problem.