From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sre@ring0.de (Sebastian Reichel) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 22:09:13 +0100 Subject: N900 board code in 3.14 In-Reply-To: References: <1384562167-14725-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <20131116120508.GA22335@earth.universe> <20131116141226.GD10317@atomide.com> <20131116155031.GA5104@earth.universe> <20131121185844.GA10023@atomide.com> <20131121235111.GC9772@earth.universe> Message-ID: <20131123210912.GA29088@earth.universe> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:41:27AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > I dropped that patch from my series and posted a v2 that just name the > VPLL2 regulator as vdds_dsi [1]. That way will be safer for Tony and > Benoit to take this series as a fix for the -rc cycle since the > changes are contained within IGEP boards DTS. I know, but the patch serves as example for me :) > > My suggestion would be to add something like this pseudocode to > > omapdss: > > > > if(board_is_n900_dt()) { > > vdds_dsi = devm_regulator_get(&dpi.pdev->dev, "V28"); > > } > > > > The problem is, that we do not want to name the regulator > > "vdds_dsi", since it's not used exclusivly for omapdss. > > > > In the future it can get the regulator via phandle of course. > > For what is worth I think that your suggestion is a good workaround. > Please just add a comment specifying that it is a hack and that we > have to get rid of these once the DSS DT bindings land on mainline and > we can use a phandle to get the regulator. I just sent a patchset, that adds DT panel support for N900. -- Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: