From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 19:43:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] CMA: Fix the phys_addr_t print types In-Reply-To: <1385264221-29952-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> References: <1385264221-29952-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Message-ID: <20131124034345.GA3873@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:37:01PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Otherwise prints would truncate the variables on LPAE machines. > > Cc: Marek Szyprowski > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar > --- > drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c > index 165c2c2..b303a98 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c > +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c > @@ -201,9 +201,8 @@ int __init dma_contiguous_reserve_area(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t base, > phys_addr_t alignment; > int ret = 0; > > - pr_debug("%s(size %lx, base %08lx, limit %08lx)\n", __func__, > - (unsigned long)size, (unsigned long)base, > - (unsigned long)limit); > + pr_info("%s(size %pa, base %pa, limit %pa)\n", __func__, > + &size, &base, &limit); Why did you change the logging level of this message?