From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:40:44 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] DT support for ST micro accelerometers and gyroscopes In-Reply-To: <52926901.9080004@kernel.org> References: <1384876234-1211-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <528DF164.8060009@st.com> <20131121131402.GF1029@lukather> <52926901.9080004@kernel.org> Message-ID: <20131125094044.GE3176@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jonathan, On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 09:00:49PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/21/13 13:14, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Denis, > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:41:24PM +0100, Denis CIOCCA wrote: > > > only one point: it's possible to use the same names with DT? > > > (using _ instead of -) > > > > Yes, it is, but only for i2c as far as I'm aware, and usually the > > DT compatibles are with - as a separator (I looked into the ePAPR, > > but couldn't get any explanations or requirements on this, even > > though it's used in all of their examples) > > In other discussions, where the defacto i2c device tree bindings have > been followed, the conclusion has been that to change to a - from _ > would result in userspace ABI changes, so whilst no one wants _ > the discussion has concluded we can't really avoid it. What kind of userspace ABI changes are we talking about? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: