From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:24 +0000 Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the DAI differently in the pdata and DT case In-Reply-To: <20131202135452.GI27568@sirena.org.uk> References: <1384859269-19801-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1384859269-19801-8-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20131202101256.GA29373@lee--X1> <20131202135452.GI27568@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20131202140324.GH31626@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 02 Dec 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:12:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > It's actually my fault. I had two patches round the wrong way in the > > series. The imediately subsequent patch in the set fixes this issue: > > OK, so what do we do about this? Is there going to be a revision of > that patch adding the note about not using the autoconfiguration stuff > and what (if any) are the dependencies on the arch/arm changes? I can shoot out a revision no problem. I'm not aware of any dependencies on the ARM changes. I haven't tested the arch/arm and sound/soc adaptions orthogonally, but I _think_ the right decisions should be made depending on the information passed from platform/dt code. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog