From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: computersforpeace@gmail.com (Brian Norris)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:28:08 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: spi-nor: add a new framework for SPI NOR
In-Reply-To: <1386084180.18201.67.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
References: <1385447575-23773-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com>
 <201312031519.49171.marex@denx.de> <529DEB2B.5060009@ti.com>
 <201312031609.36299.marex@denx.de>
 <1386084180.18201.67.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Message-ID: <20131203182808.GD9468@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:23:00PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Seriously, guys, can you please trim your citations? Include only what's
> absolutely needed for what you're saying right now!

+1

Additionally, when trimming replies, can you please leave a proper

  On <date / time>, <sende> wrote:

line before the quote? It helps to identify who said what in a quote,
and it serves a much better purpose than leaving the 'Dear So-and-so'
intact.

Seeing the following tells me who you were speaking to, not who was
actually speaking:

> > Dear Sourav Poddar,
> > 
> > > Dear Marek Vasut,
> > > 

Particularly, it seems like Marek's and Huang's mailers tend to leave
the attribution line off.

Thanks,
Brian