From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:23:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ARM Coresight: Enhance ETM tracing control In-Reply-To: <20131206000610.GA30344@kroah.com> References: <20131204170703.GA14859@kroah.com> <20131204230239.GB9205@kroah.com> <20131205040104.GA14641@kroah.com> <52A0DE42.3080602@codeaurora.org> <20131205201659.GA14539@kroah.com> <52A101F8.3060104@codeaurora.org> <20131206000610.GA30344@kroah.com> Message-ID: <20131206002345.GK4360@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 06:54:49PM -0500, Adrien Verg? wrote: > > > Well, these patches were incorrect, so that's not really a valid > > > question :) > > > > Should I correct the pid size and send them again? > > I'm not the ARM maintainer, so I can't say if I would reject them or > not. Neither am I someone who knows this code; it was contributed by TI, and I assume TI had I use for it. I've no idea what that was or how it's even used - it's not something I particularly care about. I'd much rather someone else who has a use for ETM (and thus knows what it should/can do) look after it.