From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:36:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] mfd: tps6586x: add version detection In-Reply-To: <5e063ab19c8fb9754216189c65d8f670@agner.ch> References: <7812fb79beac0a6a409090f43d129893f9f93b5b.1386333697.git.stefan@agner.ch> <20131206142605.GA32363@ulmo.nvidia.com> <5e063ab19c8fb9754216189c65d8f670@agner.ch> Message-ID: <20131206153602.GC23519@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 06 Dec 2013, Stefan Agner wrote: > Am 2013-12-06 15:26, schrieb Thierry Reding: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:51:45PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > >> Use the VERSIONCRC to determine the exact device version. According to > >> the datasheet this register can be used as device identifier. The > >> identification is needed since some tps6586x regulators use a different > >> voltage table. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner > >> --- > >> Changes since v4: > >> - Use variable named version instead of ret > >> > >> Changes since v2: > >> - Avoid moving devm_kzalloc > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > >> include/linux/mfd/tps6586x.h | 7 +++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > I think I also already gave my Reviewed-by on both this and 2/3, neither > > of which changed significantly enough to warrant that to be dropped. In > > general it's fine to keep Reviewed-by and Acked-by as long as you're > > only changing minor things. > > > > Thierry > > Ok, sorry, didn't realize that is my job to pick them up when doing new > revisions. Lee, can you add this when you apply this patch? Will it's not legislation, but it does help us a great deal. > Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding Sure. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog