From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:15:30 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] usb: dwc3: get "usb_phy" only if the platform indicates the presence of PHY's In-Reply-To: <20131203103950.GB26423@xps8300> References: <1381866857-3861-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <1381866857-3861-2-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <525E8E93.9010503@ti.com> <525E9046.3090209@ti.com> <525E943E.3080706@ti.com> <20131017145425.GE11611@gimli> <20131203103950.GB26423@xps8300> Message-ID: <20131206201530.GA21086@saruman.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:39:50PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:54:26AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:27:26PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > > > On 10/16/2013 04:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > > Do you know if there are users of dwc3 other than exynos5250 and omap5? > > > If not, we should get rid of the old USB PHY altogether. > > > > Intel's Baytrail, at least. But they don't use DT. > > I don't see any use for the generic-phy when the device is enumerated > from PCI. If dwc3 can live without phys, there should not be any > problem dropping the old USB PHY support. yeah, I don't want to drop PHY support, I want to require everybody to provide a PHY, otherwise we have too many options to handle and that's never clean. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: