From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 03:09:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] ARM: at91/dt: define sama5d3 clocks
In-Reply-To: <1385650228-8906-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
References: <1385650171-8756-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
 <1385650228-8906-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
Message-ID: <201312090309.23723.arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thursday 28 November 2013, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> @@ -92,6 +103,8 @@
>  				dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>  				pinctrl-names = "default";
>  				pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_spi0>;
> +				clocks = <&spi0_clk>;
> +				clock-names = "spi_clk";
>  				status = "disabled";
>  			};
>  
> @@ -101,6 +114,8 @@
>  				interrupts = <38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 4>;
>  				pinctrl-names = "default";
>  				pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ssc0_tx &pinctrl_ssc0_rx>;
> +				clocks = <&ssc0_clk>;
> +				clock-names = "pclk";
>  				status = "disabled";
>  			};
>  

You are adding "clock-names" properties in a lot of cases. Are you sure you
are using the strings that are documented in the respective device bindings
for each name? In a lot of cases, drivers just want an anonymous clock
and we don't name them.

	Arnd