From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: always assign of_node in mfd_add_device()
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:40:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131210084042.GN12675@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386626809-6251-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> mfd_add_device() assigns .of_node in the device objects it creates only
> if the mfd_cell for the device has the .of_compatible field set and the
> DT node for the top-level MFD device contains a child whose compatible
> property matches the cell's .of_compatible field.
>
> This leaves .of_node unset in many cases. When this happens, entries in
> the DT /aliases property which refer to the top-level MFD DT node will
> never match the MFD child devices, hence causing the requested alias not
> to be honored.
>
> Solve this by setting each MFD child device's .of_node equal to the top-
> level MFD device's .of_node field in the cases where it would otherwise
> remain unset.
How sure are you that this will be void of repercussions?
> The first use-case for this will be aliases for the TPS6586x's RTC
> device.
Isn't it viable to supply the of_compatible strings for these nodes
and search the parent for its alias property instead?
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> The 3 patches in this series are all independent; they can be applied
> to their respective subsystems in any order. I'm simply posting them as
> a series to make the use-case more obvious.
> ---
> drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> index 267649244737..32e8d47d9002 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
> }
> }
> }
> + if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> + pdev->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
>
> if (cell->pdata_size) {
> ret = platform_device_add_data(pdev,
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-10 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-09 22:06 [PATCH 1/3] mfd: always assign of_node in mfd_add_device() Stephen Warren
2013-12-09 22:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtc: honor device tree /alias entries when assigning IDs Stephen Warren
2013-12-09 22:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: tegra: set up /aliases entries for RTCs Stephen Warren
2013-12-10 8:40 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-12-10 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd: always assign of_node in mfd_add_device() Stephen Warren
2013-12-11 9:24 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-13 19:28 ` Stephen Warren
2013-12-16 8:12 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-19 17:25 ` Stephen Warren
2013-12-20 14:20 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-20 14:25 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-20 16:11 ` Stephen Warren
2014-01-06 18:12 ` Stephen Warren
2014-01-07 8:23 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131210084042.GN12675@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox