From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:42:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 08/15] mfd: menelaus: Pass menelaus_chip pointer to add/remove irq functions In-Reply-To: <20131210163249.GF22750@saruman.home> References: <20131209161422.GC24047@saruman.home> <1386606085-26838-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <1386606085-26838-8-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20131210090021.GQ12675@lee--X1> <20131210163249.GF22750@saruman.home> Message-ID: <20131210184216.GD2390@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:00:21AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Dec 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > Those functions are static and can receive a menelaus_chip pointer very > > > easily. > > > > > > Tested-by: Aaro Koskinen > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/menelaus.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > Same here. I think this should be done in one fell swoop. > > then it would become a much, much larger patch which would become a pain > to review. If the patch was doing lots of different things then I'd be inclined to agree, but although large, the changes here are pretty trivial. I tend to break up patches based on; subsystem, file, device (for platform/dts adaptions) and functionality. Rather than just because the 'lines changed' count is large. Please squash them and I'll review it. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog