From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: davem@davemloft.net (David Miller)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:28:15 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: mv643xx_eth: properly start/stop phy device
In-Reply-To: <52A80EFC.8070806@gmail.com>
References: <20131210.215253.2121948728095674632.davem@davemloft.net>
 <20131210.215654.1165181423931409066.davem@davemloft.net>
 <52A80EFC.8070806@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20131211.122815.155153567731141533.davem@davemloft.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:06:36 +0100

> On 12/11/2013 03:56 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:52:53 -0500 (EST)
>>
>>>
>>> This series looks good, applied to net-next, thanks.
>>
>> Actually, I had to revert.
>>
>> You cannot use late_initcall_sync() from code that is potentially
>> built modular, this caused my build to fail at the mdio_bus code.
>>
>> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c:344:1: warning: data definition has no type
>> or storage class [enabled by default]
>> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c:344:1: error: type defaults to ?int? in
>> declaration of ?late_initcall_sync? [-Werror=implicit-int]
>> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c:344:1: warning: parameter names (without
>> types) in function declaration [enabled by default]
>> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c:339:12: warning:
>> ?mdio_bus_class_suspend_unused? defined but not used
>> [-Wunused-function]
>>
> 
> Hmm, I see. What about you drop patch 5 ("net: phy: suspend unused
> PHYs
> on mdio_bus in late_initcall"), take the rest, and I'll have look at
> suspending unused PHYs later?

What about you resubmit the series that you want me to apply?

Thanks.