From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:07:58 -0300
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/3] Introduce atomic MMIO register modify
In-Reply-To: <20131212135221.GL10053@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <1386686497-20335-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
 <20131212135221.GL10053@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Message-ID: <20131212150757.GB1617@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:52:21AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > After this patchset stalled for several months, I'm picking where
> > we left. The last conclusion [1] was that instead of doing the arch-generic
> > from scratch, we'd start by implementing the API in ARM only.
> > 
> > In other words, this is basically a resend of v3, with some of the typos fixed
> > and using raw spinlocks.
> > 
> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg271773.html
> ...
> > If nobody has objections, I'll add patch 1/3 to ARM's tracking system
> > as usual.
> 
> It looks like everyone's ok with that.  We can submit the drivers for
> v3.15 unless Russell's willing to set up a topic branch for patches 2
> and 3 to depend upon.
> 

IMO, v3.15 is perfectly fine, there's no rush on the drivers.
-- 
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com