linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mach-moxart: add MOXA ART SoC platform files
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:07:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131213190707.GA9713@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACmBeS0Uz+Z=MsqvXburO1swCdyGvEXHhfs8M7ZnMMKBNJjG1A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:23:44PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> On 13 December 2013 17:17, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > IIRC the separate defconfig is needed because we have never gotten a mixed fa526+arm9
> > kernel to boot, right? In theory it is supposed to work and there is most likely just
> > a small bug somewhere. Once that is working, we can think about adding a generic
> > multi_v4_v5_defconfig that handles all multipltform capable platforms along the lines
> > of multi_v7_defconfig.
> 
> A mixed kernel can boot without panic (tested today).
> 
> The panic is avoided when CONFIG_ARM_THUMB=y is removed.
> 
> See thread "[PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option":
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-December/219004.html
> 
> 
> > I've been out of the loop a bit here. I initially suggested having the restart
> > handler be part of the watchdog driver, and I thought you had done that in an
> > earlier version. What has changed your mind?
> 
> I got the impression from Guenter Roeck's review, that it doesn't belong there,
> maybe I was too quick to remove it?
> 
You'd have to answer the questions I raised in my review if you want it in
there.

Guenter

> See thread "[PATCH] watchdog: Add MOXA ART watchdog driver":
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-July/183065.html
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jonas
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-13 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-13 14:33 [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: mach-moxart: add MOXA ART SoC support Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 14:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mach-moxart: add MOXA ART SoC platform files Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 16:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-13 17:23     ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 19:07       ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-12-14  4:01         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-14  8:32         ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-14 15:50           ` Guenter Roeck
2013-12-14 16:26             ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-14 18:50               ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-14 20:14                 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-12-15  0:21                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-22 19:48   ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-13 14:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: mach-moxart: add MOXA ART SoC device tree files Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 16:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-15  4:27   ` Peter Crosthwaite
2013-12-16 20:05     ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-16 23:53       ` Peter Crosthwaite
2013-12-17  0:09         ` Sören Brinkmann
2013-12-22 19:49   ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131213190707.GA9713@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).