From: tj@kernel.org (Tejun Heo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/23] mm/memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:29:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131213212912.GL27070@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386625856-12942-8-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:50:40PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> + if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
> + pr_warn_once("%s: Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is depricated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead\n",
> + __func__);
Why not just use WARN_ONCE()? We'd want to know who the caller is
anyway. Also, wouldn't something like the following simpler?
if (WARN_ONCE(nid == MAX_NUMNODES, blah blah))
nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> @@ -768,6 +773,11 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int nid,
> struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved;
> int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff;
> int ri = *idx >> 32;
> + bool check_node = (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) && (nid != MAX_NUMNODES);
> +
> + if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
> + pr_warn_once("%s: Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is depricated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead\n",
> + __func__);
Ditto.
Provided the patch is tested on an actual NUMA setup.
Reviwed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-13 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-09 21:50 [PATCH v3 00/23] mm: Use memblock interface instead of bootmem Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] mm/memblock: debug: correct displaying of upper memory boundary Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-09 22:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] mm/memblock: debug: don't free reserved array if !ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-10 0:11 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10 16:44 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] mm/bootmem: remove duplicated declaration of __free_pages_bootmem() Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] mm/memblock: remove unnecessary inclusions of bootmem.h Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] mm/memblock: drop WARN and use SMP_CACHE_BYTES as a default alignment Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:21 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] mm/memblock: reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:22 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] mm/memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:29 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-12-14 0:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] mm/memblock: Add memblock memory allocation apis Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-10 0:25 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10 16:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:37 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 0:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 11:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 19:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-20 22:30 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] mm/init: Use memblock apis for early memory allocations Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] mm/printk: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] mm/page_alloc: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] mm/power: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] mm/lib/swiotlb: " Santosh Shilimkar
[not found] ` <20131212170857.e36d016a95992c932da824b0@linux-foundation.org>
2013-12-13 1:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] mm/lib/cpumask: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] mm/sparse: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] mm/hugetlb: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] mm/page_cgroup: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] mm/percpu: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] mm/memory_hotplug: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] mm/firmware: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] mm/ARM: kernel: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] mm/ARM: mm: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] mm/ARM: OMAP: " Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131213212912.GL27070@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).