[PATCH] rtc: at91sam9: include <mach/hardware.h> explicitly

[akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)]

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 19:36:29 +0100 Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> Hello Andrew,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:44:44PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K__nig wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:41:17PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K__nig wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:00:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K__nig wrote:
> > > > The driver needs the symbol AT91_SLOW_CLOCK which is defined in
> > > > arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/hardware.h. This file is included
> > > > implicitly via linux/module.h -> linux/kmod.h -> linux/gfp.h ->
> > > > linux/mmzone.h -> linux/memory_hotplug.h -> linux/notifier.h ->
> > > > linux/srcu.h -> linux/workqueue.h -> linux/timer.h -> linux/ktime.h ->
> > > > linux/jiffies.h -> linux/timex.h -> mach/timex.h -> mach/hardware.h .
> > > > 
> > > > So better include it explicitly not only because the last link will go
> > > > away soon.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > Ping. Is this patch ok despite Jean-Christophe's objection?
> > I saw that akpm already took it into his tree.
> This patch is one of the last few that are needed to drop <mach/timex.h>
> alltogether that I don't have an ack from the respective maintainer yet.
> 
> Can you give your ack instead of sending the patch to Linus, then I'd
> take it with the patch dropping <mach/timex.h> to make it easier to
> merge.

ack ;)

I dropped my copy.