From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:12:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: always assign of_node in mfd_add_device() In-Reply-To: <52AB5FE2.5060803@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1386626809-6251-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20131211092435.GC16780@lee--X1> <52AB5FE2.5060803@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20131216081242.GD18769@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 12/11/2013 02:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >> From: Stephen Warren > >> > >> mfd_add_device() assigns .of_node in the device objects it creates only > >> if the mfd_cell for the device has the .of_compatible field set and the > >> DT node for the top-level MFD device contains a child whose compatible > >> property matches the cell's .of_compatible field. > >> > >> This leaves .of_node unset in many cases. When this happens, entries in > >> the DT /aliases property which refer to the top-level MFD DT node will > >> never match the MFD child devices, hence causing the requested alias not > >> to be honored. > >> > >> Solve this by setting each MFD child device's .of_node equal to the top- > >> level MFD device's .of_node field in the cases where it would otherwise > >> remain unset. > >> > >> The first use-case for this will be aliases for the TPS6586x's RTC > >> device. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 ++ > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > I've tentatively applied this patch, but if it starts to cause more > > problems than it solves we'll have to endeavour to find a different > > solution. > > Thanks. I don't see this in linux-next yet though, so it's not getting > much testing. Did you forget to push your branch? Pushed now, sorry for the delay. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog