From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:24:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCHv3,RESEND] rtc: Add support for Intersil ISL12057 I2C RTC
 chip
In-Reply-To: <87r49cpkw2.fsf@natisbad.org>
References: <637f26e051b700ca510a0af695dfd84cf2bfd35d.1387222475.git.arno@natisbad.org>
 <20131216201424.GA6639@roeck-us.net> <87r49cpkw2.fsf@natisbad.org>
Message-ID: <20131216212413.GA8369@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:05:01PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> Thanks for the fast feedback! I have handled all your comments and
> tested the resulting version on my RN102 w/o problems. Will send a
> v4 in a few minutes.
> 
> Can you just look at first comment below?
> 
> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ebalard <arno@natisbad.org>
> >> ---
> >> This is a resend - just in case the initial mail slept through - as I
> >> got no feedback over the past week. I have also Cc'ed additional
> >> people.
> >> 
> > Looks like your mailer corrupts the patch. You'll have to fix that.
> 
> If you wonder about the text below the SoB, this is just informational,

I know.

> i.e. to avoid having it in the final commit. Can you be more specific
> if this is not what you meant, i.e. how the patch is otherwise
> corrupted?
> 

I saved the patch and tried to run it through checkpatch. Doing so, I got a lot
of errors with "=3D" or similar, which suggests that the patch went through
Outlook, an Exchange server, or a similar e-mail "beautifier" when it was sent.

If the same happens again, I'll send you a log.

Guenter