From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:26:57 -0800
Subject: [GIT PULL] Xilinx Zynq clk changes for v3.14
In-Reply-To: <52B2A22D.6080304@monstr.eu>
References: <52B16A4B.1000706@monstr.eu> <20131219051219.18119.26127@quantum>
 <52B2A22D.6080304@monstr.eu>
Message-ID: <20131219192657.18119.4291@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 23:37:17)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On 12/19/2013 06:12 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 01:26:35)
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> As we discussed it is better for you to get pull request with signed tags.
> >> That's why I am sending you pull request for 2 patches which we have in queue which
> >> should go to v3.14.
> > 
> > Michal,
> > 
> > Thanks much for the pull request. In the future it is a bit easier if
> > you base your pull request on the tip of clk-next, but it's not a big
> > deal.
> 
> ok. No problem to do.
> 
> > 
> > Shouldn't the change to zynq-7000.dtsi go through the arm-soc tree
> > instead of the clk tree?
> 
> It is here because it is related to clock and there is no conflict
> with others DT changes we made for 3.14.
> But if you prefer not to have this change here I have no problem
> to add it to our zynq/clk branch and go through arm-soc tree.

I think it is better to take the dts patch through arm-soc. Merge
conflicts seem unlikely now, but it's best to err on the side of caution
and send that patch through the correct tree.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> -- 
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
> Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
> 
>