From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:47:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220184715.GT14866@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131219221758.GS14866@pengutronix.de>
Hello again,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:20:42AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Looks like there are still several users of LATCH, which references CLOCK_TICK_RATE
> > and is causing failures on lots of defconfigs.
> darn, I missed these because my compile testing was done without
> removing the dummy value of CLOCK_TICK_RATE in <asm/timex.h> and I then
> relied on the 0day bot who obviously didn't build the critical configs.
> :-\
>
> The problems are fixed by:
> - "ARM: rpc: stop using <mach/timex.h>" which I just sent in this
> thread.
> - "ARM: u300: fix timekeeping when periodic mode is used", a patch I
> sent earlier and that Linus W. wanted to merge. It's not yet in
> -next. Maybe I can take it instead into this series? Linus?
> - The patch pasted below distributed on the respective commits.
> Apart from the netx patch these don't have any affected acks. Sascha,
> I assume I can keep your Ack?
>
> I'll update my tree when I have feedback by Linus and Sascha.
I just did that. I squashed the changes into the respective commits,
rebased on Linus W.'s latest pull request and added the rpc change. Now
all defconfigs build.
Please pull
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git tags/dropmachtimexh
which points to 79f08d9ed217318b4f325b7fcf8f26dcd0e41689 now provided
you are happy with Linus W.'s series, too.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 22:16 [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h> Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-17 13:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-19 15:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-12-19 21:57 ` [PATCH] ARM: rpc: stop using <mach/timex.h> Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-19 22:17 ` [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h> Uwe Kleine-König
2013-12-20 8:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-20 13:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-12-20 18:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-01-07 11:24 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-01-13 13:36 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-13 18:26 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-13 19:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-02-03 10:31 ` [PATCH] [RFC] ARM: ixp4xx: fix timer latch calculation Uwe Kleine-König
2014-02-17 7:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-14 10:25 ` [GIT PULL] get rid of <mach/timex.h> Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131220184715.GT14866@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).