From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia) Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:54:36 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] dma: mv_xor: spinlock related improvements In-Reply-To: <1388144314-1581-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> References: <1388144314-1581-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20131227155435.GC15734@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:38:31PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Vinod, Dan, > > Here are three patches that make improvements to the spinlock handling > of the mv_xor driver. The first patch fixes a lock/release of the > channel spinlock in mv_xor_status(), and the next two patches make > followup code improvements/refactoring. > > Ezequiel, it would be good to have your review on these patches, since > I know you've spent some time lately doing mv_xor stuff. > Spinlocks aren't the easiest thing to get right, and this driver is not particularly simple. Anyway, to the best of my knowledge: Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia -- Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com