From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: mvebu: Add support to get the ID and the revision of a SoC
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 15:25:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401051525.52459.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388743185-24822-2-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
On Friday 03 January 2014, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> All the mvebu SoCs have information related to their variant and
> revision that can be read from the PCI control register.
>
> This patch adds support for Armada XP and Armada 370. This reading of
> the revision and the ID are done before the PCI initialization to
> avoid any conflicts. Once these data are retrieved, the resources are
> freed to let the PCI subsystem use it.
I like the idea of identifying the soc version for any number of
reasons, but I would hope there was some way of doing this that didn't
involve probing the PCI device. I know this is the traditional way
on orion/kirkwood/dove/... but it always felt wrong to me.
> +static u32 soc_dev_id;
> +static u32 soc_rev;
> +static bool is_id_valid;
Would it be reasonable to reuse the global "system_rev" variable for this
rather than a platform specific exported function?
> +static const struct of_device_id mvebu_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada-xp-pcie", },
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada-370-pcie", },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +int mvebu_get_soc_id(u32 *dev, u32 *rev)
> +{
> + if (is_id_valid) {
> + *dev = soc_dev_id;
> + *rev = soc_rev;
> + return 0;
> + } else
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mvebu_get_soc_id);
Maybe EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, out of principle?
> +static int __init mvebu_soc_id_init(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, mvebu_pcie_of_match_table);
> + if (np) {
> + void __iomem *pci_base;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + /*
> + * ID and revision are available from any port, so we
> + * just pick the first one
> + */
> + struct device_node *child = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
I guess all this will fail if for some reason the PCIe node is not
present on machines that don't use PCIe.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-05 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-03 9:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix i2c bus hang on A0 version of the Armada XP SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 9:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: mvebu: Add support to get the ID and the revision of a SoC Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 14:47 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-03 14:51 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 15:13 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 16:41 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-03 19:30 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 18:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-03 19:25 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 18:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-03 19:35 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-05 14:25 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-01-05 15:40 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-05 17:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-05 17:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-05 23:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-05 23:12 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-05 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-06 0:05 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-06 0:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-06 9:55 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-06 10:10 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-05 19:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-05 23:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-06 15:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-06 16:24 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-01-07 14:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-06 10:28 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 9:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix bus hang on A0 version of the Armada XP SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 12:20 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-03 18:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-03 19:31 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-05 14:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-06 9:09 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-07 9:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-07 13:17 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-07 20:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201401051525.52459.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).