From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:39:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: tegra: Add efuse bindings In-Reply-To: <52CB14D3.2060904@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1387891931-9854-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <1387891931-9854-4-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <52CB14D3.2060904@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20140108133951.GD1592@ulmo.nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 12/24/2013 06:32 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: [...] > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi > > > + efuse at 7000F800 { > > "fuse" might be a better node name; "efuse" is presumably the name of > the instance, not the type of object. There's another occurrence I noticed recently where we haven't followed that rule. The PMIC node on Venice2 for instance is called as3722. Perhaps that should also be renamed. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: