From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: mvebu: Add quirk for i2c for the OpenBlocks AX3-4 board
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:06:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140110210634.GL18269@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140110194550.GT19878@titan.lakedaemon.net>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > IMHO the compatible string should represent a specific HW/SW ABI. So
> > you need a unique compatible string for every variation of that ABI.
>
> My concern is that we tend to do things like "marvell,orion-sata" for
> the first version of the IP block we can work with. orion5x, kirkwood,
> dove, and armada 370/xp all use that compatible string to refer to that
> IP block.
Right, absent guidance from the originators of the IP block that is
sort of all we are left with. But something like 'marvell,orion-sata'
is just a label to describe the ABI implemented by the HW on that
particular chip.
> Given that we look at it as 'and newer', '...-a0-i2c' would mean no
> offloading until we introduce '-b0-i2c'. Or am I mis-understanding what
> you're saying?
I would stop thinking of this in terms of 'is newer' / 'is older'.
marvell,orion-sata means any HW that implements the same ABI as the
orion chip.
When we get a different chip that has a compatible, but extended ABI
we introduce a new label:
compatible = "marvell,foobar-sata", "marvell,orion-sata";
And if we get one that has a very similar, but incompatible ABI, we
still introduce a new label:
compatible = "marvell,foobar2-sata";
And everything works properly.
> > We already have a compatible string defined for the ABI that B0
> > presents.
>
> So 'mv78230-i2c' is newer than 'mv78230-a0-i2c', or are you referring to
> something else?
'mv78230-i2c' is the name that was picked to describe the ABI that
works as-documented in the manual
'mv78230-a0-i2c' is the name that was picked to describe the ABI that
works as-implemented in the A0 chip :)
There is no newer/older, they are just two different ABIs.
I guess it turns out that 'mv78230-a0-i2c' is a strict compatible
subset of 'mv78230-i2c' - but that doesn't really make a difference.
The 'mv78230-i2c' driver is guarenteed avaialble in all places where
the 'mv78230-a0-i2c' driver would be available.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-08 15:06 [PATCH v5 0/4] Fix i2c bus hang on A0 version of the Armada XP SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-08 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] ARM: mvebu: Add support to get the ID and the revision of a SoC Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-08 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: mvebu: Add quirk for i2c for the OpenBlocks AX3-4 board Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-08 15:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-08 15:28 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-10 18:22 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-10 19:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-01-10 19:45 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-10 20:08 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-10 20:12 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-10 21:14 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-10 21:21 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-10 21:37 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-10 21:52 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-13 15:02 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-10 20:09 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-10 21:11 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-10 21:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2014-01-10 21:19 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-08 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] i2c: mv64xxx: Fix bus hang on A0 version of the Armada XP SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-08 15:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-08 15:26 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-08 15:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-08 15:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-08 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] i2c: mv64xxx: Document the newly introduced Armada XP A0 compatible Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-10 21:55 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-10 23:04 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-08 15:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Fix i2c bus hang on A0 version of the Armada XP SoCs Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-08 16:46 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-14 2:14 ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-14 8:46 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-20 11:20 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-20 14:44 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140110210634.GL18269@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).