From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Add .determine_rate to composite clk
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:03:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140114210319.4167.62163@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJiWf8Wvcu0pWBNd7xSm9ES7ApTNp27CXTHWBxbr4msfNd9xCA@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Lemon Dai (2014-01-14 06:08:44)
> Hi Maxime,
>
> The commit 107f3198 in Mike's clk-next branch shows that:
> (about line 72 in drivers/clk/clk-composite.c)
>
> } else if (mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->determine_rate) {
> mux_hw->clk = hw->clk;
> return mux_ops->determine_rate(rate_hw, rate, best_parent_rate,
> best_parent_p);
>
>
> It should be fixed as follows, at least for reason that NULL rate_hw
> may be used in the old code,
>
> } else if (mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->determine_rate) {
> mux_hw->clk = hw->clk;
> - return mux_ops->determine_rate(rate_hw, rate, best_parent_rate,
> + return mux_ops->determine_rate(mux_hw, rate, best_parent_rate,
> best_parent_p);
Hi Lemon Dai,
I have applied this fix to clk-next. The patch is below:
>From ca01f3f60aa864d7ee8124ca597d4010378926b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:56:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] clk: composite: pass mux_hw into determine_rate
The composite clock's .determine_rate implementation can call the
underyling .determine_rate callback corresponding to rate_hw or the
underlying .determine_rate callback corresponding to mux_hw. In both
cases we pass in rate_hw, which is wrong. Fixed by passing mux_hw into
the correct callback.
Reported-by: Lemon Dai <dailemon.gl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
index 753d0b7..57a078e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static long clk_composite_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
best_parent_p);
} else if (mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->determine_rate) {
mux_hw->clk = hw->clk;
- return mux_ops->determine_rate(rate_hw, rate, best_parent_rate,
+ return mux_ops->determine_rate(mux_hw, rate, best_parent_rate,
best_parent_p);
} else {
pr_err("clk: clk_composite_determine_rate function called, but no mux or rate callback set!\n");
--
1.8.3.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-11 9:15 Add .determine_rate to composite clk Lemon Dai
2014-01-11 10:28 ` Maxime Ripard
[not found] ` <CAJiWf8WJxf0S32bPiXGUu3Rwmh36xYdbd0VEpLTG-pwyvVnasg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-14 14:08 ` Lemon Dai
2014-01-14 21:03 ` Mike Turquette [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140114210319.4167.62163@quantum \
--to=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).