From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:53:39 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: hisilicon: add hi3620_mmc_clks In-Reply-To: <52D5E709.7040105@linaro.org> References: <1389604469-8064-1-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org> <1389604469-8064-2-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org> <20140114201740.4167.52076@quantum> <52D5E709.7040105@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20140115035339.4167.51194@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting zhangfei (2014-01-14 17:40:25) > Dear Mike > > On 01/15/2014 04:17 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Zhangfei Gao (2014-01-13 01:14:28) > >> Suggest by Arnd: abstract mmc tuning as clock behavior, > >> also because different soc have different tuning method and registers. > >> hi3620_mmc_clks is added to handle mmc clock specifically on hi3620. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao > >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > >> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung > > > > Patch looks good to me with one exception. I do not have > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt in the > > clk-next branch. Is there a stable branch I can pull in as a dependency? > > Mach-hisi just have been uploaeded. > Have tried next-20140114, the patch can be applied successfully. > While v3.13-rc8 still can not. > > Is this fine? Can you give me a link to the branch that introduces Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt? I guess the patch introducing it is going through arm-soc. Is this going in for 3.14? If so then perhaps the clk tree and the arm-soc tree can share a stable branch that introduces it. Regards, Mike > > Thanks