From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:58:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 4/7] ARM: brcmstb: add CPU binding for Broadcom Brahma15 In-Reply-To: <1389743333-16741-5-git-send-email-marc.ceeeee@gmail.com> References: <1389743333-16741-1-git-send-email-marc.ceeeee@gmail.com> <1389743333-16741-5-git-send-email-marc.ceeeee@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140115165825.GJ25824@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:48:50PM +0000, Marc Carino wrote: > Add the Broadcom Brahma B15 CPU to the DT CPU binding list. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Carino > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > index 9130435..423b879 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described below. > "arm,cortex-r4" > "arm,cortex-r5" > "arm,cortex-r7" > + "brcm,brahma15" Given all the documentation I can find online calls the CPU "Brahma-B15", would it not make more sense for this to be "brcm,brahma-b15"? That would match what we do for the ARM Cortex-[ar]\d processors. Otherwise, this looks fine to me. Cheers, Mark.