From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: perf: support dwarf unwinding in compat mode
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:07:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140117100723.GB16003@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFrcx1=QWPFeuNDc0JatiykGnRuvPyOgwwCxnW7pSAiNa9RsxA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:00:09AM +0000, Jean Pihet wrote:
> On 16 January 2014 14:47, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> So the simplest thing would be to make compat_user_stack_pointer expand to
> >> user_stack_pointer(current_pt_regs()) on arm64 and merge that in with your
> >> original patch fixing user_stack_pointer.
>
> I see 2 issues in your proposal:
>
> 1) user_stack_pointer(regs) calls compat_user_stack_pointer if
> compat_user_mode(regs)) and compat_user_stack_pointer expands to
> user_stack_pointer. I see a circular dependency in the macros.
Not today it doesn't, so you just need to avoid writing the circular
dependency and instead make user_stack_pointer access (regs)->compat_sp
instead.
> 2) current_pt_regs() returns the current task regs although perf
> passes a regs struct that had been recorded previously.
Yes, but compat_user_stack_pointer doesn't take a regs paramater anyway, so
there's no change in behaviour here.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 10:45 [PATCH] ARM64: perf: support dwarf unwinding in compat mode Jean Pihet
2014-01-16 11:56 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-16 12:26 ` Jean Pihet
2014-01-16 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-16 13:47 ` Jean Pihet
2014-01-17 9:00 ` Jean Pihet
2014-01-17 10:07 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-01-20 17:05 ` Jean Pihet
2014-01-21 11:20 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140117100723.GB16003@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox