From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: New randconfig build failure: rx51 asoc / gpiolib
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:12:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140117131257.GB15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
Last night's omap randconfig found this. This has only appeared in the
builds in the last few days, so it's a new regression for the changes
queued up for merge window:
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:220:33: error: array type has incomplete element type
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:222:3: error: field name not in record or union initializer
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:222:3: error: (near initialization for 'rx51_av_jack_gpios')
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:223:3: error: field name not in record or union initializer
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:223:3: error: (near initialization for 'rx51_av_jack_gpios')
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:224:3: error: field name not in record or union initializer
...
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c: In function 'rx51_aic34_init':
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:325:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_soc_jack_add_gpios'
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:326:89: error: type defaults to 'int' in type name
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:326:89: error: type defaults to 'int' in type name
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:326:89: error: negative width in bit-field '<anonymous>'
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c: In function 'rx51_soc_exit':
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:437:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_soc_jack_free_gpios'
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:437:120: error: type defaults to 'int' in type name
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:437:120: error: type defaults to 'int' in type name
sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:437:120: error: negative width in bit-field '<anonymous>'
which is caused by "struct snd_soc_jack_gpio" not being defined. For
some reason, this structure is defined in sound/soc.h, but is
conditionalised upon CONFIG_GPIOLIB.
This means either the dependencies on SND_OMAP_SOC_RX51 are incorrect
(they don't include a dependency on GPIOLIB) or ASoC is wrong to make
the definitions conditional upon GPIOLIB.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 13:12 Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-01-20 17:16 ` New randconfig build failure: rx51 asoc / gpiolib Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140117131257.GB15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox