From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: moinejf@free.fr (Jean-Francois Moine) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:27:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 13/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: use irq for connection status and EDID read In-Reply-To: <52D2EC5D.2010800@gmail.com> References: <20140109120412.7697d23c@armhf> <20140111181432.GB15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <52D18EE9.5030305@gmail.com> <20140112195113.316d0c98@armhf> <52D2EC5D.2010800@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140117182708.3758acb1@armhf> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:26:21 +0100 Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 01/12/2014 07:51 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:35:21 +0100 > > Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > > >> At least for the DT part, I'd suggest to not ask for interrupt directly > >> but use a proper gpios property. The can of course be converted to > >> priv->int_irq in some tda998x_dt_probe. > > > > May you give me more information? > > Sure, see [1]. > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-May/038822.html Thanks for the link, but I still don't see the advantage of the gpio (which value?) over the irq number. -- Ken ar c'henta? | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/