From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar)
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:22:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: timer-sun5i: Switch to sched_clock_register()
In-Reply-To: <52D9709E.4000804@linaro.org>
References: <1389922686-6249-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
 <52D90060.5020104@linaro.org> <52D96ED6.20508@codeaurora.org>
 <52D9709E.4000804@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20140119122221.GC17808@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org


* Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 01/17/2014 06:56 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 01/17/14 02:05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>On 01/17/2014 02:38 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>The 32 bit sched_clock interface supports 64 bits since 3.13-rc1.
> >>>Upgrade to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
> >>>registration interface.
> >>>
> >>>Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> >>>---
> >>>
> >>>Cc'in Ingo because this is simple enough to probably just apply to
> >>>timers/core
> >>
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> I applied your patch in my tree for 3.15.
> >>
> >
> > I was hoping we could remove setup_sched_clock() in 3.14-rc1 
> > timeline, but if we delay this until 3.15 we'll have to wait 
> > another 3 months. Is there any chance we can get this in for 3.14?
> 
> I am ok with that. It is up to Ingo.

Such simple patches are generally not a problem, I've applied it to 
timers/core with your Acked-by.

Thanks,

	Ingo