From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:33:01 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] dma: fix vchan_cookie_complete() debug print
In-Reply-To: <20140120112822.GA15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1386344529-25617-1-git-send-email-jonas.jensen@gmail.com>
 <20140120095917.GZ26823@intel.com>
 <20140120112822.GA15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20140120120301.GE26823@intel.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:28:22AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:29:17PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 04:42:09PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> > > vd->tx.cookie is set zero on dma_cookie_complete(),
> > > save to local before printing it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Notes:
> > >     dev_vdbg() could also be moved to happen earlier, what do you prefer?
> > This would be preferred IMHO. Also pls cc dmaengine at vger on this
> 
> I prefer this version - it means that the verbose debug printk doesn't
> impact the completion timing when printk is expensive (eg, because its
> outputting via a serial port.)
But if you know your printk is costly, do you want to enable these?

-- 
~Vinod