From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:13:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings In-Reply-To: References: <1384265558-10521-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20140121171313.GC27111@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > This defines the device tree bindings for the Toshiba TC3589x > > series of multi-purpose expanders. Only the stuff I can test > > is defined: GPIO and keypad. Others may implement more > > subdevices further down the road. > > > > This is to complement > > commit a435ae1d51e2f18414f2a87219fdbe068231e692 > > "mfd: Enable the tc3589x for Device Tree" which left off > > the definition of the device tree bindings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > > --- > > ChangeLog v2->v3: > > - Fix the keys/rows bindings to be u32 rather than > > /bits/ 8, inconsistency noted by Mark Rutland. > > ChangeLog v1->v2: > > - Include a verbose example in the DT bindings. > > - Explain why this is a stand-alone bindings patch. > > So will this since Nov 12 uncommented-upon patch be merged or > do you want me to do some change? > > There was some back-and-forth regarding the (existing, already > in use) linux-specific input bindings but the only thing I can > see is some back and forth leaning toward just letting these > be used. We still need a DT Ack. > I am happy to change this in whatever way but no directions > for two months.... If it had slipped though the gaps, I'd probably suggest poking or re-sending before the middle of the merge-window though. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog