From: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 00/73] tree-wide: clean up some no longer required #include <linux/init.h>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:38:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140123003838.GA10182@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140122180023.dd90d34cba38d9f9ac516349@canb.auug.org.au>
[Re: [PATCH RFC 00/73] tree-wide: clean up some no longer required #include <linux/init.h>] On 22/01/2014 (Wed 18:00) Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:22:03 -0500 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> >
> > Where: This work exists as a queue of patches that I apply to
> > linux-next; since the changes are fixing some things that currently
> > can only be found there. The patch series can be found at:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git
> >
> > I've avoided annoying Stephen with another queue of patches for
> > linux-next while the development content was in flux, but now that
> > the merge window has opened, and new additions are fewer, perhaps he
> > wouldn't mind tacking it on the end... Stephen?
>
> OK, I have added this to the end of linux-next today - we will see how we
> go. It is called "init".
Thanks, it was a great help as it uncovered a few issues in fringe arch
that I didn't have toolchains for, and I've fixed all of those up.
I've noticed that powerpc has been un-buildable for a while now; I have
used this hack patch locally so I could run the ppc defconfigs to check
that I didn't break anything. Maybe useful for linux-next in the
interim? It is a hack patch -- Not-Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker. :)
Paul.
--
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
index d27960c89a71..d0f070a2b395 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
@@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
pmd_t *pmdp);
#define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
-typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
-static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
- spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
+struct spinlock;
+static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
+ struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
{
/*
* Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-21 21:22 [PATCH RFC 00/73] tree-wide: clean up some no longer required #include <linux/init.h> Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 16/73] arm: include module.h in drivers/bus/omap_l3_smx.c Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 17/73] arm: fix implicit module.h use in mach-at91 gpio.h Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 18/73] arm: fix implicit #include <linux/init.h> in entry asm Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 19/73] arm: mach-s3c64xx mach-crag6410-module.c is not modular Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-23 13:16 ` Charles Keepax
2014-02-15 17:04 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 20/73] arm: use subsys_initcall in non-modular pl320 IPC code Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 22:19 ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 21/73] arm: don't use module_init in non-modular mach-vexpress/spc.c code Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 27/73] drivers/clk: don't use module_init in clk-nomadik.c which is non-modular Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-31 23:17 ` Mike Turquette
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 28/73] cpuidle: don't use modular platform register in non-modular ARM drivers Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-21 21:22 ` [PATCH 33/73] arm: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h> Paul Gortmaker
2014-01-22 7:00 ` [PATCH RFC 00/73] tree-wide: clean up some no longer required #include <linux/init.h> Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-23 0:38 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2014-01-28 3:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-28 16:21 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140123003838.GA10182@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).