From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:11:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] mfd: tc3589x: Reform device tree probing
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZjRG=cmWHmmFNS+=guCwQoFpu8T3r4YHr6t_XihvmaWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1390481008-23900-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
 <20140123133141.GD8586@lee--X1>
 <CACRpkdZjRG=cmWHmmFNS+=guCwQoFpu8T3r4YHr6t_XihvmaWA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140123151123.GE8586@lee--X1>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> > Patch looks good to me. Is there any reason why we should rush this in
> > for v3.14, or is it okay to go to -next?
> 
> No rush, but it's been on review like forever so unless there is
> some noise from the DT people at -rc1 I'd be very happy if you
> could apply patches 1 & 2 by then.

I'm just waiting for their Ack. If I don't have it soon I'll review it
myself and any changes will have to come in via subsequent patch
submissions.

I think it's sensible to head for v3.15 for this set.

> The third one can be applied out-of-order to the input tree after
> that.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog