From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:25:22 +0800
Subject: DT include files
In-Reply-To: <2907925.DyxHkYtGr7@phil>
References: <20140103023211.GA25079@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
 <201401122121.20084.arnd@arndb.de>
 <20140113021912.GB23525@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
 <2907925.DyxHkYtGr7@phil>
Message-ID: <20140125022519.GA8759@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 09:02:09AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> did this topic get any final resolution - especially in terms of the pingrp.h 
> header?
> 
> As I'm currently preparing two board files (imx50 and imx6sl) this discussion 
> made me unsure if using the pin-group definitions is still the preferred style.

Yes, we need to get a conclusion ASAP.  The whole imx-dt-3.14 pull
request has been held for a few weeks because of that, and I'm asking
for direction there [1].

Shawn

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58685/focus=296761