From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] audit: Add generic compat syscall support
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:15:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127121505.GD32608@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E5F56F.2030502@linaro.org>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:58:07AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Catalin and audit maintainers,
>
> On 01/23/2014 11:51 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:03:15AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >> diff --git a/lib/compat_audit.c b/lib/compat_audit.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..94f6480
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/lib/compat_audit.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> >> +#include <linux/init.h>
> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >> +/* FIXME: this might be architecture dependent */
> >> +#include <asm/unistd_32.h>
> >
> > It most likely is architecture dependent.
>
> I'm wondering what name is the most appropriate in this case.
> Most archictures have __NR_xyz definitions in "unistd_32.h",
> but arm64 doesn't have it, instead "unistd32." which contains
> only __SYSCALL(xyz, NO). Confusing?
I don't think we should introduce a new file (or at least it should be
named something containing "audit" to make it clearer).
> >> +int audit_classify_compat_syscall(int abi, unsigned syscall)
> >> +{
> >> + switch (syscall) {
> >> +#ifdef __NR_open
> >> + case __NR_open:
> >> + return 2;
> >> +#endif
> >> +#ifdef __NR_openat
> >> + case __NR_openat:
> >> + return 3;
> >> +#endif
> >> +#ifdef __NR_socketcall
> >> + case __NR_socketcall:
> >> + return 4;
> >> +#endif
> >> + case __NR_execve:
> >> + return 5;
> >> + default:
> >> + return 1;
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >
> > BTW, since they aren't many, you could get the arch code to define
> > __NR_compat_open etc. explicitly and use these. On arm64 we have a few
> > of these defined to avoid name collision in signal handling code.
>
> Again, most architecture have their own unistd32.h for compat system calls,
> and use __NR_open-like naming.
> It's unlikely for these archs to migrate to "generic compat" auditing,
> but I believe that '__NR_open'-like naming is better because we may be able to avoid
> arch-specific changes even for future(?) syscall-related enhancements in audit.
My preference is as above, a few __NR_compat_* (just those required by
audit) defined in unistd.h but I'm not an audit maintainer.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1384854235-6567-1-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
2014-01-17 8:03 ` [PATCH v3] audit: generic compat system call support AKASHI Takahiro
2014-01-17 8:03 ` [PATCH v3] audit: Add generic compat syscall support AKASHI Takahiro
2014-01-23 14:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 5:58 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2014-01-27 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-01-29 5:58 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2014-01-30 18:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-02-03 6:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/1] audit: generic compat system call support AKASHI Takahiro
2014-02-03 6:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] audit: Add generic compat syscall support AKASHI Takahiro
2014-03-15 5:47 ` [PATCH_v5] audit: generic compat system call support AKASHI Takahiro
2014-03-15 5:48 ` [PATCH_v5] audit: Add generic compat syscall support AKASHI Takahiro
2014-03-16 19:13 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140127121505.GD32608@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).