From: ben@trinity.fluff.org (Ben Dooks)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Q] block / zynq: DMA bouncing
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:24:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127152457.GA1073@trinity.fluff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1401271549280.23931@axis700.grange>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 04:13:56PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on an MMC driver with a DMA capability. All has been working
> well, until at some point I've got a bus error, when the mmc driver had
> been handed in a buffer at 0x3000 physical RAM address. The reason is,
> that on Zynq arch bus masters cannot access RAM below 0x80000. Therefore
> my question: how shall I configure this in software?
>
> The way I found was to use ARM-specific struct dmabounce_device_info and
> implement its .needs_bounce() method to return true for those addresses.
> Is this the right way or is there a better / more straight-forward one?
>
> To do the above I have to enable CONFIG_DMABOUNCE, which then selects
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA. Having done just that I suddenly discover, that 0x3000
> buffers aren't used any more, so, I cannot actually verify my
> implementation :) Looking at ZONE_DMA it looks like it is still covering
> the whole RAM range (/proc/zoneinfo shows start_pfn=0 in zone DMA), so, I
> don't see why 0x3000 should be excluded now.
>
> So, is using the .needs_bounce() method the correct way to support DMA on
> this arch or is there a better one?
I have a similar issue with Renesas R8A7790 where there is a bus bridge
that can only deal with transactions to one half of the available RAM.
--
Ben Dooks, ben at fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/ben/
Large Hadron Colada: A large Pina Colada that makes the universe disappear.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 15:13 [Q] block / zynq: DMA bouncing Guennadi Liakhovetski
2014-01-27 15:24 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2014-01-27 15:35 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2014-01-27 17:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:45 ` Michal Simek
2014-01-27 17:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:57 ` Michal Simek
2014-01-27 22:34 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2014-01-28 13:28 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2014-01-28 13:33 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2014-01-28 13:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-28 13:54 ` Michal Simek
2014-01-28 18:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140127152457.GA1073@trinity.fluff.org \
--to=ben@trinity.fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).