From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:41:13 -0500 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: DT boards for v3.14 (incr #6) In-Reply-To: References: <20140120200110.GW29184@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20140128184113.GX29184@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:36:51AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > > All, > > > > I had a few boards that came in late in the cycle. I was holding on to > > them for the next round, but after Olof's comment this morning: > > > > Re: [PATCH 0/2] DT updates for Hummingboard and new Cubox-i > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg301777.html > > > > I figured I'd send them off. As usual, they've been in -next for a > > while. Also, this is an incremental request from tags/mvebu-dt-3.14-5 > > to tags/mvebu-dt-3.14-6 on the mvebu/dt branch. > > > > If this is going to be ok for the forseeable future, I'll do a separate > > branch for new boards next time around. > > I should probably clarify my previous statement. I don't think we want > a free-for-all on new DT contents all the way up until -rc, > but what we can allow sometimes is new DT files when there's good > reason to do so -- for example for platforms where a lot of new code > has landed and it's been hard to sequence DT updates with the rest, > etc. ok, no problem. > So, if you send these late requests please be prepared to motivate > them. :) These don't look urgent to me so I think we'll queue them for > 3.15 once -rc1 is out, if that's OK with you. Yep, I just didn't want to miss the boat. :) Please drop this request and I'll queue these up for post-rc1. thx, Jason.