From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pza@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel) Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality In-Reply-To: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> References: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> Message-ID: <20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Heiko, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote: > On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko St?bner wrote: > > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip > > Cortex-A9 SoCs. > > So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more > general patches could use an ack. > > Going forward, what would be best way to merge them? > As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first > three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going > through arm-soc? Or something else altogether? > > > > Heiko Stuebner (7): > > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property > > One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a > Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland . > Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished > from Rob? > > And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original > thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) . > > > > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory > > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option > > Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also > contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool > parts) you asked for. > > Could I persuade you to take a look again? Acked-by: Philipp Zabel regards Philipp