From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: moinejf@free.fr (Jean-Francois Moine) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 20:00:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 00/23] In-Reply-To: <20140202180433.GI26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20140202124358.GD26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140202180433.GI26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20140202200040.555414b3@armhf> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:04:34 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > So, in summary, I'm pretty happy with this again - and it's all been > tested here with no apparant detrimental effects. All committed and > queued up here: > > http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/cgit/linux-cubox.git/log/?h=tda998x-devel > > If you want to pull it back to check: > > git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-cubox.git tda998x-devel > > I'm proposing to send everything up to the tda998x-fixes tag next week > for 3.13-rc kernels. Everything is OK. Thank you. -- Ken ar c'henta? | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/