linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: w@1wt.eu (Willy Tarreau)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk init order
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:16:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140203231603.GA11613@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52EA2A04.2070109@gmail.com>

Hi Sebastian,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 01/30/14 11:24, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >On 25/01/2014 19:19, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>This patch set fixes clk init order that went upside-down with
> >>v3.14. I haven't really investigated what caused this, but I assume
> >>it is related with DT node reordering by addresses.
> >
> >Can you explain what kind of issue do you observe?
> 
> Sure. When probing CLK_OF_DECLAREed clock drivers, clock-gating driver
> gets registered before core-clocks. It therefore cannot resolve it's
> parent clock name for tclk and all clock gates will have no parent
> clock.
> 
> Usually, you'll see in some drivers (e.g. v643xx_eth) div_by_zero errors
> poping up, when they calculate a frequency division factors based on
> clock gate frequency, which should have been tclk but is 0 now.

Well, to be honnest, I have no idea whether your patch is the right way
to fix the problem or not, but what I can say is that it fixes such oopses
that appear in 3.14-rc1 when booting on mirabox :

Division by zero in kernel.
CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 3.13.0-bck-mbx #6
Workqueue: kmmcd mmc_rescan
[<c0010865>] (unwind_backtrace+0x1/0x98) from [<c000e947>] (show_stack+0xb/0xc)
[<c000e947>] (show_stack+0xb/0xc) from [<c0135913>] (Ldiv0+0x9/0x12)
[<c0135913>] (Ldiv0+0x9/0x12) from [<c01f708b>] (mvsd_set_ios+0xcb/0x160)
[<c01f708b>] (mvsd_set_ios+0xcb/0x160) from [<c01ec1fd>] (__mmc_set_clock+0x2d/0
x40)
[<c01ec1fd>] (__mmc_set_clock+0x2d/0x40) from [<c01f1a59>] (mmc_sdio_init_card+0
x391/0x808)
[<c01f1a59>] (mmc_sdio_init_card+0x391/0x808) from [<c01f2163>] (mmc_attach_sdio
+0x5b/0x218)
[<c01f2163>] (mmc_attach_sdio+0x5b/0x218) from [<c01ed0d9>] (mmc_rescan+0x159/0x
1b4)
[<c01ed0d9>] (mmc_rescan+0x159/0x1b4) from [<c0024579>] (process_one_work+0xa9/0
x21c)
[<c0024579>] (process_one_work+0xa9/0x21c) from [<c002494d>] (worker_thread+0xb5
/0x248)
[<c002494d>] (worker_thread+0xb5/0x248) from [<c0027f1b>] (kthread+0x7b/0x94)
+0xa7/0x138)
[<c04228b3>] (kernel_init_freeable+0xa7/0x138) from [<c027e6cf>] (kernel_init+0x
7/0xb8)
[<c027e6cf>] (kernel_init+0x7/0xb8) from [<c000cb9d>] (ret_from_fork+0x11/0x34)
mvsdio d00d4000.mvsdio: lacking card detect (fall back to polling)

By the way, seeing how often a trick related to the DT is nedeed to solve an
oops or a panic, I'm really scared that this whole DT mess is just becoming
the exact copy of the ACPI mess (but 15 years later) and we'll experience the
same horrible things :-( Sometimes I'm wondering whether there are not too
many structural things put in there...

Regards,
Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-03 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-25 18:19 [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk init order Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: mvebu: armada-370: maintain clock " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: mvebu: armada-xp: " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: mvebu: dove: " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] clk: mvebu: kirkwood: " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 21:32 ` [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk " Emilio López
2014-01-25 21:44   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 22:11     ` Emilio López
2014-01-26  0:25       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-27 14:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-27 18:21   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-27 18:28     ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-30 10:24 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-30 10:31   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-02-03 23:16     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2014-02-03 23:36       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-02-04 14:58         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-04 20:07           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-05 14:08 ` Mike Turquette
2014-02-05 17:43   ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-05 18:34 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-06 17:08   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-06 18:08     ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-17 14:13   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 14:25     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 14:42       ` Emilio López
2014-02-17 15:04         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 15:31           ` Emilio López
2014-02-17 15:21       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 15:28         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 15:44           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 15:59             ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 18:19               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-18  9:47                 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:28                   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-19 20:24                   ` Emilio López

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140203231603.GA11613@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).