From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:43:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] cpu/idle.c: move to sched/idle.c
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1402061152550.1906@knanqh.ubzr>
References: <1391017513-12995-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
 <1391017513-12995-7-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
 <20140130152500.GB5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <alpine.LFD.2.11.1401301102210.1652@knanqh.ubzr>
 <20140130162753.GF5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <alpine.LFD.2.11.1402061152550.1906@knanqh.ubzr>
Message-ID: <20140206164336.GU2936@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:09:59PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Did you merge those patches in your tree? 

tree, tree, what's in a word. Its in my patch stack yes. I should get
some of that into tip I suppose, been side-tracked a bit this week.
Sorry for the delay.

> If so, is it published somewhere?  

http://programming.kicks-ass.net/sekrit/patches.tar.bz2

It is of varying quality at best.

> That would be a good idea if that could appear in linux-next 
> so to prevent people from adding more calls to cpuidle_idle_call() from 
> architecture code.  I'm sending you 2 additional patches right away to 
> remove those that appeared in v3.14-rc1.

Yeah, once they land in tip they'll end up in -next automagically. I'll
try and get that sorted tomorrow somewhere.