From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH v2] ARM: vDSO gettimeofday using generic timer architecture
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:12:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210171200.GE26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210165113.GA7891@linaro.org>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:51:16PM +0000, Steve Capper wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:20:23AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:05:49PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > + /* Grab the vDSO code pages. */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vdso_pages; i++) {
> > > + pg = virt_to_page(&vdso_start + i*PAGE_SIZE);
> > > + ClearPageReserved(pg);
> > > + get_page(pg);
> > > + vdso_pagelist[i] = pg;
> > > + }
> >
> > Why do we want to clear the reserved status? This looks over complicated
> > to me.
> >
>
> This looks like it was inherited from the PowerPC code where the
> behaviour of set_pte_at would change dependent on whether or not the
> page was reserved (set_pte_at->set_pte_filter->maybe_pte_to_page). I
> think we can safely remove this from ARM and ARM64.
Great, so we can get rid of that and the get_page() on the vdso data
page below.
> > > +
> > > + /* Sanity check the shared object header. */
> > > + vbase = vmap(vdso_pagelist, 1, 0, PAGE_KERNEL);
> > > + if (vbase == NULL) {
> > > + pr_err("Failed to map vDSO pagelist!\n");
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + } else if (memcmp(vbase, "\177ELF", 4)) {
> > > + pr_err("vDSO is not a valid ELF object!\n");
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto unmap;
> > > + }
> >
> > Why do we need to vmap() pages which are already accessible - vdso_start
> > must be part of the kernel image, and therefore will be accessible via
> > standard mappings.
> >
>
> This is a dress rehersal for install_special_mapping more than anything.
> If we map the page, and look at the first 4 bytes, are they what we
> expect?
My point is that we can already view this page directly by dereferencing
vdso_start - do we really need to perform this apparant test of the MMU?
If the MMU isn't working in this way, we have much bigger and more
fundamental problems...
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 23:05 [RFC/PATCH v2] ARM: vDSO gettimeofday using generic timer architecture Nathan Lynch
2014-02-09 10:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-10 16:51 ` Steve Capper
2014-02-10 17:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-02-11 8:44 ` Steve Capper
2014-02-10 23:57 ` Nathan Lynch
2014-02-11 10:45 ` Will Deacon
2014-02-11 16:23 ` Nathan Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140210171200.GE26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).