linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH v2] ARM: vDSO gettimeofday using generic timer architecture
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:12:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210171200.GE26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210165113.GA7891@linaro.org>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:51:16PM +0000, Steve Capper wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:20:23AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:05:49PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > +	/* Grab the vDSO code pages. */
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < vdso_pages; i++) {
> > > +		pg = virt_to_page(&vdso_start + i*PAGE_SIZE);
> > > +		ClearPageReserved(pg);
> > > +		get_page(pg);
> > > +		vdso_pagelist[i] = pg;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Why do we want to clear the reserved status?  This looks over complicated
> > to me.
> > 
> 
> This looks like it was inherited from the PowerPC code where the
> behaviour of set_pte_at would change dependent on whether or not the
> page was reserved (set_pte_at->set_pte_filter->maybe_pte_to_page). I
> think we can safely remove this from ARM and ARM64.

Great, so we can get rid of that and the get_page() on the vdso data
page below.

> > > +
> > > +	/* Sanity check the shared object header. */
> > > +	vbase = vmap(vdso_pagelist, 1, 0, PAGE_KERNEL);
> > > +	if (vbase == NULL) {
> > > +		pr_err("Failed to map vDSO pagelist!\n");
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +	} else if (memcmp(vbase, "\177ELF", 4)) {
> > > +		pr_err("vDSO is not a valid ELF object!\n");
> > > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > > +		goto unmap;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Why do we need to vmap() pages which are already accessible - vdso_start
> > must be part of the kernel image, and therefore will be accessible via
> > standard mappings.
> > 
> 
> This is a dress rehersal for install_special_mapping more than anything.
> If we map the page, and look at the first 4 bytes, are they what we
> expect?

My point is that we can already view this page directly by dereferencing
vdso_start - do we really need to perform this apparant test of the MMU?
If the MMU isn't working in this way, we have much bigger and more
fundamental problems...

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07 23:05 [RFC/PATCH v2] ARM: vDSO gettimeofday using generic timer architecture Nathan Lynch
2014-02-09 10:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-10 16:51   ` Steve Capper
2014-02-10 17:12     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-02-11  8:44       ` Steve Capper
2014-02-10 23:57   ` Nathan Lynch
2014-02-11 10:45     ` Will Deacon
2014-02-11 16:23       ` Nathan Lynch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140210171200.GE26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).